Wednesday, March 3, 2010

My Story in Support of HR 4662: Lymphedema Treatment Bill

I receieved an e-mail this week from the National Lymphedema Network annoucing that legistlation regarding Lymphdema treatment had been introduced in Congress. As I read the e-mail I began to cry, because finally my struggle was being addressed. There were others out there who understood, and better yet there were people in a position of power who were willing to make change happen.




My story:
I was diagnosed with bilateral lower extremity lymphedema in December 2001. From 2002-2004, I received manual lymph therapy and compression wrapping to reduce the swelling of my legs. During this same time I was hospitalized approximately 8 times for cellulitis, had a medi-port placed for IV antibiotics, and had weeks of home health care three different times. The cost of this care was hundreds of thousands of dollars. During most of this time I was covered by Ohio Medicaid. However, my last major infection in September 2004, which was accompanied with a deep vein thrombosis and required two weeks in the hospital, was covered by United Healthcare, which I had through my new employer.

In October 2004, I began three months of manual lymph therapy and compression wrapping. I was limited to 20 sessions of occupational therapy during my plan year. However, January 1st a new year began and I would have a new set of 20 sessions. There was a two week gap. Compression wrapping requires continued wrapping to avoid any set-backs and flare ups. Two weeks without being wrapped would undo the previous 2 1/2 months of progress. And yet, the insurance company refused to authorize the additional visits for the plan year.

After I recovered from the set back from the gap in care, I reached a point where custom fitted compression garments were ordered. Once the compression therapy reduced the size of my legs as much as possible, the compression garments would help maintain the size of my legs by reducing the daily swelling. Because of the odd shape of my legs, the garments had to be custom fitted, so the correct level of compression was provided. The average cost of a full pair of garments is $1000. Typically, garments need replaced every 6 months.

Now compared to the hundreds of thousands of dollars I previously racked up in medical bills, one would think $2000 is a much better deal. Especially given that I would have some responsibility to pay a portion of the $2000 through my co-pay or deductible for Durable Medical Equipment under my insurance plan. In the business sense, garments are a much better option than numerous hospital stays and costly medication for cellulitis.

And yet, every year I have to fight my insurance company to get my compression garments covered.

This bill is very much needed. It's a shame it will take an act of Congress to make the industry understand that prevention of complications is less expensive than treating the complication. I know as a patient, no matter how uncomfortable compression garments are to wear some days, I'd much rather wear my garments than to suffer a case of painful cellultis.


Proof that treatment works!!!


From the NLN e-mail:


"I encourage you to contact your local Representatives and Senators. Urge them to co-sponsor H.R. 4662 and to introduce a similar bill in the Senate. Stress the fact that this bill is projected to save hundreds of millions of dollars every year in avoidance of costs of treating preventable lymphedema-related cellulitis. This is a quality of care issue affecting insured patients and is complementary to healthcare access issues. Time is of the essence for you who have had difficulty in obtaining proper treatment for your LE. We may never have a better opportunity!


You may find your Congressional representatives by going to http://www.contactingthecongress.org and entering your address."

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Surprised, Shamed, Accepted

Last week I received a call from the Social Security Administration (SSA). The woman stated I was due for an annual review. Annual review seemed odd since I had not received any Supplemental Security Income since 2004, and last spoke to someone at SSA in 2005 for what I thought was an over the phone exit interview. She said the computer indicated I was due for a review because I might possibly qualify for Social Security Disability, if I wasn't working and was still disabled.

I'm not working, but I'm trying to find a job. I want to work. I got myself off SSI, Medicaid and food stamps six years ago because I wanted to be a contributing member of society. And after years of living on SSI and credit cards I can't afford to be on SSD.

I am disabled. As much as the smile on my face, and positive outgoing attitude might indicate I'm otherwise, it's not easy for me to work. The best thing for my lymphedema would be to keep my legs elevated at all times. Find me a legal job, without having to move to Nevada, where that is possible. Wearing compression garments allows me to be on my feet or sitting throughout the day, but as the day progresses and the swelling resumes, the garments pinch and start to hurt. But I know others deal with far worse than I do, and I'm lucky to have garments so I don't complain. I go about life the best I can.

So I go in for the review, I explain to the woman that I had called SSA when I got laid off and was told that if I made more than $500 a month they could not help me. In addition, I had a 401k to which I thought I would have to completely drain before I could receive any assistance. She said well it appears you now have enough work credits to get SSD whereas when you first applied in 2000 you did not and could only get SSI. Do you want to apply for SSD?

No, I don't want back on the system. I can't live off SDD for the rest of my life. But I also don't want to tell SSA "no". What if I need them in five years, will a "no review" on my record hinder my ability to receive assistance in the future? I told her I'd rather apply and be told I do not qualify than to refuse the review. Oh, but by the way, my unemployment benefits is more than $500 a month. She said that doesn't matter for SSD.

So she asked if I'm married, have kids, work, address, etc. No request for my current doctor, no request for any of the thick folder of bank statements, ultility bills, or tax documents. She did confirm my disability was morbid obesity and I quickly added "and lymphedema and lipedema". Sadly, my SSI was given to me simply because I was fat. How embarrassing, true my weight at over 500lbs prevented me from being able to work but embarrassing to have to admit. So a few more taps on the keyboard and she says, "o.k. everything is good to go, you'll get a check in 4-6 weeks".

What? That's it. I know people fight for years to get SSD and I just got coverted from SSI to SSD in all of 15 minutes.

Surprised: I couldn't believe it was that simple. Someone is watching over me, had I not been called in for a review I would have never thought I could get any type of help. I had asked and was told otherwise based on my previous status.

Shamed: While the assistance is needed and is a relief that I'll be able to live and pay my bills while looking for work, and I could possibly get Medicare (I *heart* government healthcare) in the future, I have a feeling of shame. I had worked so hard to better my overall condition through improved health and education to get OFF the system, and here I am back ON. I don't want to be like my cousin who boasted to my mom about "finally getting SSD, so he'll never have to work again". He even claimed to have "the same thing Sarah's got wrong with her legs"...the loathing I feel towards him....I started to feel towards myself for slipping back on assistance.

Accepted: I am disabled. I'm not working. The point of SSD is to provide assistance to the disabled. I paid into the system, and now it is helping me when I need it. It's not forever. When I find a job the benefits will stop, as they did before. There is no shame in needing help. I will not resign to living on the system, what I did before I can do again. Only this time it will be a bit easier, I already have my education and my health is improved since 2000.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

The WLS Pick-up Line

I was hit on today. No, not like that.

A woman tried to recruit me to have "the surgery". Little did she know I had already spotted her as a post-op so I totally knew where her pick-up lines were leading.

It started when the supervisor who was giving me a tour of the hospital asked her how she was doing, she replied “Good, the doctor took me off one medicine and put me on five. I’m vitamin deficient and xyz med was irritating my stomach.”

The vitamin deficient totally made me look at her hair…which wasn’t that thin but still thin enough to make me wonder.

So while I was observing the guy next to her, she complimented me on my sweater. I thanked her and explained it was more comfortable than a suit jacket on my arms. She then said she loved her sweater and couldn’t get rid of it despite it coming from the Avenue and being too big “on her now”. For any of my non-fattie readers, the Avenue is a plus-size clothing store. So that was her hint that she was a former fattie. So then she says, “I was really big, and it was hard for me to do my job. So I had ‘the surgery”. Here again, code word although even non-fatties typically know “the surgery” refers to weight loss surgery just as “the pill” refers to birth control. Then she got out her before pictures to show me how wonderful she has done.

As this point I’m quite sure she is trying the polite approach to recruit me, so I tell her that I too had “the surgery” seven years ago then gave her the spiel of how I was over 500lbs, I have lymphdema and lipedema which is partly why I’m so fat….blah blah blah…I’ll bring the picture later.

After lunch I felt I couldn’t take my bottle of Diet Sunkist back with me because I’d be judged, and I wasn’t sure of the drinks policy in the work area.

I showed her my “before picture” but honestly it’s like saying ‘you think I’m FAT now…omg I used to be HUGE’. Why must I explain my size to people? Well in this case I did so she’d turn off the recruitment script.

Oh, and then of course in reply I put asked her if she was a member of ObesityHelp. She said no….bawahaha the recruiter is going to become the recruited. I’m taking the pamphlet with me next week!

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The bigger the better!

I love the Olympics, and figure skating is my favorite of the Winter Games! So when I saw this article today I was overjoyed...for her and for the message it sends to women.

Ice dancer Belbin has put on weight, and she couldn't be happier.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Fatty Fatty 2x4


2x4=8

If a serving of cereal is 150 cals for 3/4 cup then a kid who eats 2 servings will be eating...

=300 calories

1 cup = 200 cals
2 cups = 400 cals

And I did all that math in my head...yes, my shoes are off but its Florida and I wear flip-flops a lot...I promise I didn't need a calculator or my appendages to figure out that math.

So explain why the FDA thinks regulating serving sizes is going to change the way people eat. It's simple math people. So what now we're going to have a generation of obese and stupid kids???

One Bowl = 2 Servings F.D.A May Fix That

The information is there, on the box...and actually some smaller potato chip bags give per serving and entire bag nutritional facts. I'll admit that has NEVER stopped me from eating the entire bag. I mean if I'm to the point of grabbing a snack size bag of Funyuns I'm obviously stressed and usually thankful that the entire bag is less than 400 calories.

I for one can and do eat a serving of cereal; I actually eat less than a serving of some cereal. I have cute little cereal bowls and I put a lot of strawberries on top. I actually feel like it's a huge Saturday morning bowl of cereal because of how the milk makes the berries almost over flow the edge. Total cereal: 1/2 cup

I will admit I don't like reading a label and it stating a serving in oz and not a number. For instance don't tell me a serving of cheese is 1 oz., give me 1/4 cup or how many cubes. And most packages I find that information in the nutritional fact area.

This whole idea reminds me of the idea to make Tylenol by prescription because people are taking too much. Or the FDA wants to reduce the milligrams of the over-the-counter version. Hello, people are just going to take more, lowering the dose isn't going to help the fact people like to pop pills for any reason and if they don't get relief in five minutes they will pop more.

People who are too lazy to read nutritional labels now and figure out the damage of eating a triple serving aren't going to read the new label that does the math for them.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Was it all just a dream?

More like a nightmare.

Yesterday in all of a 140 character Tweet I was told I most likely do not have lymphedema or lipedema, because both are “very rare” and are accompanied with other birth defects. I was told this by an obesity doctor.

Tweet: ppll believe that #genes are responsible for obesity. For the most part, #obesity genes come w on/off switches in response to bodys milieu

My Reply: I'm in the least part, my #obesity is from my #genes...#lipedema and #lymphedema @born2lbfat

Tweetback: probably not Sarah. those syndromes are very rare & present in early childhood, often accompanied by other birth defects.

My reply: Oh, I wish that were true...but I do have both, I'm a rare being. =) Pic of legs @born2lbfat

Tweetback: If that's so, hopefully your doctor is helping. I wish you well in your journey to health.

Then later: There are very few real obesity genes. The shape of your body & how fat distributes is genetic. Most other #obesity... http://bit.ly/cz9if9

And again: Real #obesity #genes are present from birth, often accompanied by other birth defects.

And again: We have evolved into believing that cultural &familial #obesity is "#genetic". It isn't. The good news is, it can be healed.

What upsets me the most is this is coming from someone who makes a living “helping” obese patients. I’m not going to name names and call people out, I won’t tell someone they are wrong as quickly as I was. I was simply sharing my experience. From what I read, her MD is in Psychiatry. Her rational makes sense and I’m sure it applies to and helps many people. It’s true, not everyone is fat for the same reasons.

However, it’s bad enough that most doctors are not educated on lymphedema. So to have a doctor who touts themselves as an obesity doctor to not acknowledge the possibility of lymphedema contributing to obesity is just bothersome. At least in the combination of treatment the obese patient with lymphedema will need compression therapy for the affected limbs. Lipedema is rarer, so I am a bit more forgiving. But a quick heads up to ALL medical professionals when I person walks (if they can even walk) into your office with legs that look like this…something isn’t right.

You know for years I was told all my problems were just because I was fat and if I would just eat less I’d lose weight. Even when my legs were filling with fluid and in stages of elephantitis, I was told it was just my weight. When I was FINALLY diagnosed with lymphedema I had hope that with treatment I would one day be “normal”. I began aggressive compression treatment; I was tethered to a compression pump for 6-8 hours a day. My legs were compression wrapped in layers of foam, and bandages from my toes to my groin three days a week. I went to class and to work wrapped up like a mummy, because I had a desire to live a productive life no matter how much discomfort and pain I had to endure. I had gastric bypass surgery, because being closer to a normal weight is part of treating lymphedema, and I was aware that not ALL my weight came from lymph fluid, my poor eating habits did play a role.

About a year after surgery I moved to Miami and saw a lymph specialist. He asked me if my surgeon told me surgery would only help me lose weight above the waist. I replied “of course not”. So then he told me that I didn’t have primary lymphedema as previously diagnosed, I had primary lipedema with secondary lymphedema.

Woohoo, lucky me!!!

As I searched the internet for information (which btw I have NEVER read of lymphedema or lipedema being accompanied by other birth defects) I felt a bit of relief…the fat is not my fault, all my life I never ‘felt’ fat and this is answer, it’s not my fault. Then came the realization, if the fat is not my fault, then there isn’t much I can do to get rid of it either. There is no way to know what fat is from my poor eating habits, and which fat is from lipedema. I’ve made major changes to my eating habits, exercise more and am still fat and will be for life.

I don’t use lipedema as an excuse to just be fat. I want to be healthy, I want to lose more weight, and I work towards that every day. I have lost over 150lbs; I no longer have sleep apnea, or high blood pressure. I’ve never had diabetes. I am the “healthy” fat person…if you don’t count the DVT, TIA, and PFO (omg could that be my other birth defect?)

I agree I am a rare case. And there are many people who resign to thinking their obesity is genetic and they have no control over it. I do not agree, I DO have control over my life, I can control my health within reason, I have control over my weight, if I did not have control I would be over 500lbs again. However, with the lipedema I do not have limited control, and knowing that challenges me to do the most I can to “beat this” with the realization that I will never weigh 120lbs as the insurance charts state as my “normal” weight.


Not normal, but much better.

So as much as I wish the past 10 years of my life were not true, that I did not have lipedema and lymphedema: that the numerous doctors, physical and occupational therapists in two states were wrong about my life sentence of care, treatment, and maintenance of these conditions; that I didn’t endure years of compression therapy, nights of waking up in pain from wraps that slipped and became too tight, hospitalization for painful cellulitis, arguments with insurance companies to get the care I needed in order maintain my conditions.

If only a simple 140 character Tweet could erase all that…but only in my dreams.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Me on Oprah

While I was home last weekend someone asked me about being on Oprah. Honestly, I was surprised because it was so long ago and I wasn't technically "on" Oprah, a video segment of me was shown on Oprah. I never went to Chicago or met Oprah. I had e-mailed the show in response to seeing Stacey Halprin. The first time I saw her on the show was during my senior year in college. I'm quite certain I was skipping class to watch TV in my dorm room and I saw Stacey speaking of how her weight embarassed her and kept her from doing things in life and I actually started to write Oprah a letter that day saying the biggest problem I have with my weight is that it wasn't a problem. It didn't bother me enough to want to change it, while I didn't let my weight keep me from doing things in life it soon caught up with me. After I saw the follow-up segment on Stacey's weight lose surgery I wrote an e-mail to show to tell how Stacey had long been an inspiration to me. To my surprise the show called me months later when they were planning another follow-up show with Stacey.

One of the first segments I saw.

This is the segment to which I replied.

This was my segment, I have the video on VHS maybe I should look into getting it digital.

http://www.oprah.com/health/Follow-Up-with-Stacey/slide_number/6#slide